See the cryptography actually running.
Connect activity to the workload and connection that used it.
Environment-aware post-quantum migration
Discover active cryptography, compare upgrade paths for your workloads, and protect supported connections without changing application code.
For security and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) migration leads working with application and infrastructure owners. Supported Linux workloads; remediation depends on compatibility and deployment requirements.
From distributed activity to a migration decision
See which cryptography your workloads use. Plan a supported migration or protection path, then verify the change and its impact.
Connect activity to the workload and connection that used it.
Review ownership, dependencies, and evidence gaps.
The decision gap
The next decision is which upgrade path will work for your application, what else it affects, and what it costs to run. Different workloads need different answers.
Start with security requirements and compatibility constraints. Compare performance only among options that satisfy those requirements.
Use observed workload relationships and blast-radius analysis to identify dependencies to review before a change.
Use measurements, simulation, and controlled experiments to compare options under defined conditions.
Discover → Plan → Remediate → Validate
One workflow for discovering active cryptography, comparing options, applying a supported change, and validating the result. Your team reviews the evidence and chooses the path.
A scan captures cryptographic activity with the process, implementation, library, and network details available for the workload.
What is active, and where?Compare upgrade options against security requirements, dependencies, and measured or simulated costs. Trace the potential impact of a change.
Which acceptable path fits?Choose a customer-executed native upgrade, supported proxy protection, or supported OpenSSL implementation redirection. Each path has its own prerequisites.
What can we change now?Compare before-and-after cryptographic behavior or negotiation and measured costs under relevant workload conditions. Keep the evaluated path and remaining gaps visible.
Did the change meet the goal?Where to start
Start where uncertainty, a vendor dependency, or a blocked change makes the migration decision difficult.
Migration review
Evaluate the workload, compare acceptable paths, and agree on an actionable migration evidence report.
Scope an assessment →Vendor & legacy software
Inspect runtime activity when application source is partial, unavailable, or insufficient for the question.
Explore runtime evidence →Selected traffic
Evaluate proxy protection for a selected connection segment while the broader migration progresses.
Understand protection →Behind a migration decision
Start with an observed crypto event. Trace its process, library, and available network context. Use that evidence to evaluate alternatives and define the change and validation your team needs.
This Console view shows the evidence connection. An assessment adds the options, test conditions, decision, and before-and-after review.
Explore the evidence trail →Inside the product
Explore the real Laviq Console in the product walkthrough, from captured cryptographic activity to the migration review.
Questions, answered
What Laviq captures, where it fits, and how to begin.
Laviq helps enterprises discover active cryptography, plan workload-specific post-quantum migration, apply supported changes, and validate the result. It connects runtime evidence to dependencies and evaluates options using measurements, simulation, and controlled experiments where applicable.
An inventory describes what is packaged, declared, or configured. Runtime evidence describes activity observed while the workload runs. Both are useful: Laviq adds execution context to help your team investigate what was active during a particular collection window.
No. Laviq produces runtime evidence on supported Linux systems, including when source access is partial or unavailable. The deployment and coverage requirements still need to be checked for your workload.
Start with a representative Linux workload and a specific migration question. Review operating system, kernel, architecture, permissions, and workload requirements during scoping. Support for your particular environment should be confirmed before deployment.
The agent collects evidence about cryptographic activity without requiring private-key material. Review the collection boundaries and deployment requirements with your team before an assessment.
Learn & evaluate
Go deeper into the product, prepare your environment, or help shape the workflow around a real migration question.
Knowledge base
Installation, evidence interpretation, assessment preparation, and troubleshooting.
Browse the guides →Agent Trust
Review what is collected and what the evidence can support.
Read the trust model →Design partners
Bring a workload and help refine the evidence your team needs.
Explore a partnership →