Environment-aware post-quantum migration

Plan and execute
post-quantum migration.

Discover active cryptography, compare upgrade paths for your workloads, and protect supported connections without changing application code.

For security and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) migration leads working with application and infrastructure owners. Supported Linux workloads; remediation depends on compatibility and deployment requirements.

laviq. / migration overview
The Laviq Console · runtime evidence and migration priorities in one review.

From distributed activity to a migration decision

From active cryptography
to a validated change.

See which cryptography your workloads use. Plan a supported migration or protection path, then verify the change and its impact.

Runtime evidence connects discovery to migration or protection and validation Laviq observes supported Linux workloads and correlates available application, process, crypto-library, and connection evidence. The highlighted chain shows those runtime relationships, with key-use metadata, certificate context, and cryptographic-operation evidence attached. Teams use dependencies, ownership, migration status, and evidence gaps to plan a change. Planning leads to a customer-executed application or crypto-library upgrade, proxy protection on a supported selected connection segment, or both. Protection is limited to the configured connection segment and requires a compatible destination. Both paths lead to validation of cryptographic behavior or negotiation, affected workloads and dependencies, and before-and-after performance measurements. This is an illustrative workflow with no customer results, benchmark values, automatic enforcement gate, or claim of complete observation coverage. MachinesHosts VMsVirtual machines ContainersContainer workloads KubernetesPod workloads Runtime agent endpointprotocolcrypto operationdependency ApplicationProcessCrypto libraryConnection Application → process → crypto library → connection Keysusage metadata Certificatestrust context laviq. PlanDependencies & gaps MigrateApp / crypto library ProtectSelected connection segment Either path, or both ✓ ✓ ✓ CryptographyWorkload impactPerformance Change and impact verified.
01 / DISCOVER

See the cryptography actually running.

Connect activity to the workload and connection that used it.

Machines VMs Containers Kubernetes
Runtime agent ApplicationProcessCrypto libraryConnection Key-use metadataCertificate context
PLAN → REMEDIATE → VALIDATE

Plan your migration. Verify the change.

Review ownership, dependencies, and evidence gaps.

The decision gap

Knowing what crypto you have is only the first step.

The next decision is which upgrade path will work for your application, what else it affects, and what it costs to run. Different workloads need different answers.

01 / REQUIREMENTS

Define acceptable options

Start with security requirements and compatibility constraints. Compare performance only among options that satisfy those requirements.

02 / DEPENDENCIES

Understand the impact

Use observed workload relationships and blast-radius analysis to identify dependencies to review before a change.

03 / TRADEOFFS

Evaluate the cost

Use measurements, simulation, and controlled experiments to compare options under defined conditions.

Discover → Plan → Remediate → Validate

From discovery to a validated next step.

One workflow for discovering active cryptography, comparing options, applying a supported change, and validating the result. Your team reviews the evidence and chooses the path.

  1. 01 / DISCOVER

    Discover active cryptography

    A scan captures cryptographic activity with the process, implementation, library, and network details available for the workload.

    What is active, and where?
  2. 02 / PLAN

    Compare paths for this workload

    Compare upgrade options against security requirements, dependencies, and measured or simulated costs. Trace the potential impact of a change.

    Which acceptable path fits?
  3. 03 / REMEDIATE

    Apply a supported change

    Choose a customer-executed native upgrade, supported proxy protection, or supported OpenSSL implementation redirection. Each path has its own prerequisites.

    What can we change now?
  4. 04 / VALIDATE

    Check behavior and cost

    Compare before-and-after cryptographic behavior or negotiation and measured costs under relevant workload conditions. Keep the evaluated path and remaining gaps visible.

    Did the change meet the goal?
follow the evidence / execution match
Product example · connected evidence in the Laviq Console.

Behind a migration decision

Follow the finding to the workload.

Start with an observed crypto event. Trace its process, library, and available network context. Use that evidence to evaluate alternatives and define the change and validation your team needs.

This Console view shows the evidence connection. An assessment adds the options, test conditions, decision, and before-and-after review.

Explore the evidence trail →

Inside the product

See the workflow.
Follow the evidence.

Explore the real Laviq Console in the product walkthrough, from captured cryptographic activity to the migration review.

Watch on YouTube

Questions, answered

A clearer starting point.

What Laviq captures, where it fits, and how to begin.

All questions & answers →

What does Laviq help my team do?

Laviq helps enterprises discover active cryptography, plan workload-specific post-quantum migration, apply supported changes, and validate the result. It connects runtime evidence to dependencies and evaluates options using measurements, simulation, and controlled experiments where applicable.

How is runtime evidence different from a static inventory?

An inventory describes what is packaged, declared, or configured. Runtime evidence describes activity observed while the workload runs. Both are useful: Laviq adds execution context to help your team investigate what was active during a particular collection window.

Do I need application source code?

No. Laviq produces runtime evidence on supported Linux systems, including when source access is partial or unavailable. The deployment and coverage requirements still need to be checked for your workload.

Which environments should we evaluate first?

Start with a representative Linux workload and a specific migration question. Review operating system, kernel, architecture, permissions, and workload requirements during scoping. Support for your particular environment should be confirmed before deployment.

Does the agent collect private keys?

The agent collects evidence about cryptographic activity without requiring private-key material. Review the collection boundaries and deployment requirements with your team before an assessment.

Start a conversation

Bring one workload. Leave with a clearer next step.

Explore compatible migration options, the evidence behind them, and what to validate next.