Product

A migration path
that fits your workload.

Laviq helps enterprises plan and execute post-quantum migration by discovering active cryptography, evaluating workload-specific upgrade options, and protecting supported connections without changing application code.

Discover → Plan → Remediate → Validate

Discover. Plan. Remediate. Validate.

Move from observed activity to an evaluated change. Current comparisons are operator-assisted; your team reviews requirements, evidence, and deployment prerequisites.

  1. 01 / DISCOVER

    Discover active cryptography

    A scan captures cryptographic activity with the process, implementation, library, and network details available for the workload.

    What is active, and where?
  2. 02 / PLAN

    Compare paths for this workload

    Compare upgrade options against security requirements, dependencies, and measured or simulated costs. Trace the potential impact of a change.

    Which acceptable path fits?
  3. 03 / REMEDIATE

    Apply a supported change

    Choose a customer-executed native upgrade, supported proxy protection, or supported OpenSSL implementation redirection. Each path has its own prerequisites.

    What can we change now?
  4. 04 / VALIDATE

    Check behavior and cost

    Compare before-and-after cryptographic behavior or negotiation and measured costs under relevant workload conditions. Keep the evaluated path and remaining gaps visible.

    Did the change meet the goal?

01 / Discover

Start with what your workload actually used.

Raw Evidence shows the cryptography Laviq captured in the workload, with the process and implementation details your team needs to investigate it.

what happened / runtime evidence
Real Laviq console screenshot · the starting point for understanding the workload.

What you can see

See the event before deciding what to change.

  • Crypto operations and implementation identity.
  • The process and library behind the activity.
  • Network negotiation details when captured.
  • Measurements and call-stack detail when collected.

02 / Plan · Compare options

See what needs attention first.

Use workload context and dependencies to compare acceptable upgrade paths. Security requirements constrain the options; measurements and simulation help assess their operational cost.

F

Findings

Prioritized concerns that give your team a place to start.

I

Inventory

The workloads, libraries, and endpoints seen in the run.

C

Correlations

Connections between a concern and the workload or network path behind it.

P

Performance

Measured behavior from the workload.

E

Evidence

The records behind each review.

R

Experiments

Catalog-backed controlled experiments to investigate acceptable alternatives.

02 / Plan · Priorities

See what needs attention first.

The dashboard brings active findings, exposure, coverage, owner gaps, and migration progress together so your team can focus the next review.

migration priorities / dashboard
Real Laviq console screenshot · the dashboard turns runtime activity into migration priorities.
trace the workload / connected evidence
Real Laviq console screenshot · the relationship between a concern, workload, network path, and crypto activity.

02 / Plan · Trace the workload

See how a concern connects to the workload.

This view links the concern to the target, process, network path, implementation, and crypto activity so your team can see what is behind it.

02 / Plan · Performance Lab

Measure the behavior behind the decision.

Performance Lab shows measured samples and related operations from the workload. Combine measurements with simulation and controlled experiments where applicable. Record test conditions and distinguish simulated estimates from measurements of an actual change.

measured behavior / performance
Real Laviq console screenshot · measured behavior that supports the migration review.
selected traffic / protection
Real Laviq console screenshot · protection for selected new matching traffic.

03 / Remediate · Selected traffic

Protect selected traffic while the migration progresses.

Steer selected supported connections through a PQC-capable proxy to a compatible destination. This protects the configured, evaluated connection segment. Review routing, trust, and certificate requirements. Active policies apply to new matching connections only.

03 / Remediate

Choose the change your environment supports.

No single remediation path fits every workload. Confirm operation, connection, version, and deployment compatibility before selecting one.

Native upgrade

Change the application or library.

Your team executes an application, library, or configuration upgrade using the evidence and evaluated options. Laviq does not automatically perform every native upgrade.

Connection protection

Protect a supported segment.

A PQC-capable proxy can protect selected connections to compatible destinations without source changes. Application-internal cryptography and other segments retain their own scope.

OpenSSL redirection

Redirect a supported implementation.

Supported OpenSSL operations can use runtime implementation redirection without source changes, preserving expected output and application behavior. Confirm operation and version support with the team.

Implementation substitution is different from algorithm substitution. OpenSSL redirection is not a demonstrated native post-quantum algorithm upgrade. Automated workload-specific recommendations are planned; transparent algorithm substitution remains future research.

04 / Validate

Check the change against the goal.

Compare before-and-after crypto behavior or negotiation and measured costs for the evaluated environment and path.

  • Behavior: verify the operation or negotiated protection actually observed after the change.
  • Cost: compare relevant measurements under documented workload and test conditions.
  • Boundary: distinguish original application behavior, proxy measurements, and simulated results.
  • Decision: record remaining coverage gaps, prerequisites, and the next owner or test.

Deployment & coverage

Understand the scope
of the evidence.

Results depend on what ran, the collection window, and the supported observation path. Review deployment requirements and coverage with your team.

  • Environment: representative, supported Linux workloads.
  • Evidence: activity captured during the run, with context when available.
  • Protection: selected new matching connections within supported paths.
  • Decision: keep application, connection-segment, and full-path claims distinct.

Start a conversation

Bring one workload. Leave with a clearer next step.

Explore compatible migration options, the evidence behind them, and what to validate next.